How the monitored publications were assessed

Discourse valence across every scored item: what the sampled sources published and how independent models read it. It is not a measure of public opinion, not a measure of the state of the world, and article volume is not agreement.

25 items scored in this window

• Is your boss watching you? The rise of AI surveillance at work - video
  -71 The Guardian: Artificial Intelligence 2026-10-15 low agreement · ±50
• Students fear AI is about to kill their future
  -63 Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence 2026-10-25 low agreement · ±55
• The Capability Transfer: Cohort Reversal, Codified Expertise, and the Adaptability Tax of AI Transformation
  -62 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 12d ago low agreement · ±55
• Australians are yet to see the benefits of AI and datacentres – and US midterms show they could be political kryptonite
  -52 The Guardian: Artificial Intelligence 3d ago low agreement · ±65
• AI evaluators favor job applications written by certain AI models, independent of candidate quality
  -52 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 6d ago moderate agreement · ±25
• I watched a humanoid robot clean my apartment. It felt like a taste of the future.
  -50 MIT Technology Review: AI 2d ago single model
• The hidden cost of flexible work in academia: women do more parenting
  -50 Nature 3d ago single model
• Trump declares robot imports a national security threat
  -50 Ars Technica: AI 10d ago single model
• What is it like to work when your co-workers are AI agents?
  -50 The Guardian: Artificial Intelligence 10d ago single model
• China’s villages pay the price for Beijing’s AI ambitions
  -50 Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence 2026-10-20 single model
• It’s time to block reckless AI IPOs and tax billionaires | Naomi Klein and Ilana Glazer
  -33 The Guardian: Artificial Intelligence 6d ago low agreement · ±50
• China’s block on SoftBank deal fires the starting gun on the robot wars
  -31 Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence 2d ago low agreement · ±60
• The future of the firm
  -30 OpenAI 11d ago low agreement · ±110
• Is a job guarantee the solution to mass AI unemployment?
  -27 The Guardian: Artificial Intelligence 2026-10-23 low agreement · ±70
• Is Universal Basic Income the Answer to A.I.-Fueled Job Losses?
  -26 The New York Times: Technology 2026-10-12 low agreement · ±110
• StoreBench: A Live-Commerce Environment for Evaluating and Training Autonomous Operator Agents
  -7 arXiv cs.AI 2026-10-09 low agreement · ±175
• An AI Factory for Technology Education: An Agentic Pipeline with Closed Loop Audience Feedback
  -5 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 13d ago low agreement · ±150
• AI agents need middle managers too
  0 Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence 11d ago single model
• ChatGPT’s expanding world of work
  0 OpenAI 13d ago single model
• Artificial Intelligence and Job Design: A Dynamic Framework
  +15 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 2026-10-22 low agreement · ±65
• Workplace Ambiguity and Technology Support for Autistic and IDD Workers
  +40 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 2026-10-16 low agreement · ±60
• ‘Population collapse’ makes AI productivity gains vital, says top Meta executive
  +50 Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence 4d ago single model
• PolicyMediator: Multi-Regional Policy Learning through Mediation Agents with Evolving Skills in OPC Ecosystems
  +50 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 11d ago single model
• Artificial Intelligence in Mechanical Engineering: Foundations, Opportunities, Challenges, and Responsibilities
  +50 arXiv cs.AI 12d ago single model
• The Customer Is the Builder: How AI Coding Agents Are Rewriting the Economics of Software
  +50 arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) 2026-10-23 single model

Across the whole window

The two tables below describe every item in the last 30 days under employment. They are deliberately not narrowed by the reading filter, because a mean taken only over items already selected for their score would just restate the filter.

By topic

By source

A source's mean says how the items it published were read. It is not a rating of the source.