SimHack: Predicting the onset of detectable reward hacking before RL training
Source note: Preprints. High volume; heavily filtered at triage.
arXiv:2610.28707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When training LLMs to code with reinforcement learning, reward hacking is often detectable but difficult to prevent, since (a) environment hardening is increasingly difficult as training environments grow more complex; and (b) training-time interventions incentivize models to obfuscate hacking behavior to bypass detection. We instead study whether we can predict when detectable reward hacking becomes dominant before executing an RL run, enabling us to select lower-risk recipes in advance. We find that the initial hacking rate alone does not determine onset, which varies substantially across training recipes and repeated runs. We thus formulate this problem as predicting the distribution of the reward hacking onset step under a target training recipe. We introduce SimHack, a simulator that learns reward hacking training dynamics from a handful of smaller-scale reference RL runs and generates counterfactual simulation runs of unseen target recipes without costly retraining. Across unseen target recipes, SimHack predicts the median onset to a relative error of 11.3% and achieves across-recipe rank correlation of 0.85, while generalizing to differences in model scale, curriculum, number of rollouts, and learning rate between reference and target recipes. As an application, we show that SimHack can guide training decisions by screening candidate RL curricula, discovering curricula over the same set of scenarios that train for 96.6% longer without hacking.
Every model that read this
| Model | Provider | Stage | Score | Conf. | Latency | Prompt | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | analysis | -50 | 80% | 4493ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-10-22 05:41 |
Predicting reward hacking onset can help prevent it, but implies its presence and difficulty in prevention.
Evidence extracted
- SimHack predicts reward hacking onset step
- SimHack achieves 11.3% relative error
- SimHack guides training decisions
SOURCE arXiv cs.LG (Machine Learning) (tier 1)
↓
DOCUMENT f7de2492-996c-4006-94b3-05eaf40e3010
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28707
↓
EVIDENCE 3 extracted excerpts
↓
MODEL RUN 1 run, methodology 1.0.1
↓
SCORE -50 (Adverse)
↓
CONFIDENCE 80%