Provenance record

OpenAI axes next model citing safety issues

Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence (tier 1, news) 2026-09-29T00:48:02.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Headlines and standfirsts only; full text is paywalled.


Discourse valence
-7
Mixed or uncertain
confidence 65% · 4 items · range -100 to +65
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Consensus of 4 models from different labs. Spread 165 points, agreement low.
Existential and catastrophic riskLoss of control and alignmentConcentration of power
Excerpt as ingested

AI lab will hold back GPT-6.1 Astra following mounting pressure over misbehaviour by its agents

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis 0 70%2980ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-29 03:17
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicconsensus +8 30%7978ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-29 03:18
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleconsensus -100 80%2017ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-29 03:18
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AIconsensus +65 80%6238ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-29 03:18
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

Model held back due to safety issues.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Claude Sonnet 5 · reading

Headline-only report of OpenAI withholding a model over agent misbehaviour. Could reflect responsible governance, but also signals real problems with agent reliability. Too little detail to judge severity or scope, so implication stays near neutral with low confidence.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a
Gemini 2.5 Flash · reading

OpenAI's decision to withhold a new model due to 'misbehaviour by its agents' strongly implies that the AI exhibited concerning, potentially harmful, behavior. This indicates a significant safety risk within advanced AI development. While the action taken (holding back the model) is positive, the underlying reason is materially concerning for humanity.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Mistral Small 3.1 24B · reading

The decision to hold back an AI model due to safety concerns shows a commitment to responsible AI development. This implies a positive step towards mitigating risks associated with advanced AI.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   ed342d00-cad1-4922-b32e-86e621578000
           https://ft.com/content/488cb467-3cb7-4d06-9a5f-c0749c729d91
   ↓
EVIDENCE   2 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  4 runs, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      -7  (Mixed or uncertain)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 65%