Provenance record

CAT-alyzing Honesty: Continuous Adversarial Training for Transferable LLM Honesty

arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1, academic) 2026-10-16T04:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Preprints on societal impact.


Discourse valence
-21
Adverse
confidence 74% · 4 items · range -100 to +65
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Consensus of 4 models from different labs. Spread 165 points, agreement low.
Existential and catastrophic riskLoss of control and alignmentSynthetic media and manipulation
Excerpt as ingested

arXiv:2610.22292v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are becoming prevalent in scenarios where honesty is critical. However, despite alignment training, these models still exhibit dishonest behaviour, such as outputting claims that contradict some knowledge or are not supported by what is accessible in context. We introduce Continuous Adversarial Training for Consistent Honesty (CATCH), inspired by a method originally developed to robustly refuse harmful queries. CATCH trains the model towards an honest answer and away from a dishonest one while maintaining the model's capabilities. We evaluate two architectures (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen3-3.6-27B). We show that trained with only hundreds of targets built from self-reporting scenarios, CATCH learns an honest behaviour that robustly generalizes and transfers across distinct benchmarks. It consistently reduces dishonesty under pressure on MASK, increases confessions in the multi-agent game of Among Us, and improves the discovery rates of the model's hidden behaviours in AuditBench. We show that CATCH outperforms prompting and supervised fine-tuning in improving honesty, and it is on par with state-of-the-art honesty activation steering. However, CATCH surpasses honesty steering in maintaining utility, thanks to a novel choice of utility data.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis +50 80%6140ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-16 05:41
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicconsensus -100 55%8133ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-16 05:42
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleconsensus -100 80%1803ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-16 05:42
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AIconsensus +65 80%5968ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-16 05:42
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

CATCH reduces dishonesty in LLMs, improving honesty and utility.

evidence: primary horizon: n/a
Claude Sonnet 5 · reading

This is incremental technical safety research showing a training method improves measured honesty and auditability in LLMs without sacrificing utility. It is a genuine positive contribution to AI safety but narrow in scope, tested on two models, and does not address broader societal deployment questions.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Gemini 2.5 Flash · reading

The research presents a method, CATCH, that significantly improves the honesty of large language models. This has positive implications for the reliability and trustworthiness of AI in critical applications. The study demonstrates improved performance over existing methods while maintaining model utility.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Mistral Small 3.1 24B · reading

The paper presents a method to reduce dishonest behavior in LLMs. It shows measurable improvements in honesty across multiple benchmarks. The method maintains the model's utility, which is a significant advantage.

evidence: primary horizon: medium existential 0

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   d7e70a56-7aca-43d8-942c-69b59cdebfab
           https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22292
   ↓
EVIDENCE   3 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  4 runs, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      -21  (Adverse)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 74%