Provenance record

Who Should We Listen to More? Welfare-Aware Preference Acquisition for Pluralistic Alignment

arXiv cs.LG (Machine Learning) (tier 1, academic) 2026-10-15T04:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Preprints. High volume; heavily filtered at triage.


Discourse valence
+20
Favourable
confidence 70% · 1 item
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Single-model reading. This item did not meet the threshold for a multi-model panel.
Evaluation and measurementGovernance and regulation
Excerpt as ingested

arXiv:2610.19035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pluralistic alignment needs to accommodate diverse preferences under limited human feedback. Using AI simulators to label preference comparisons reduces annotation costs, but variation in simulation accuracy across individuals can leave some people's preferences poorly represented in training. We study how to allocate human feedback across people to construct training data for pluralistic alignment, and how this allocation affects the trained policy. To make this allocation explicit and controllable, we define a social welfare objective over individual supervision utilities that measure label quality. Each query's marginal welfare gain depends on its expected supervision improvement, the recipient's current utility, and application-designated priority. Welfare-Aware Preference Acquisition (WAPA) uses auxiliary reference models to estimate query gains and individual utilities, then selects queries by estimated marginal welfare gain while updating recipient utilities. We prove exact optimality of the acquisition algorithm for the estimated welfare objective under a fixed query budget and model predictions. Experiments on six Roleplay collections and four OpinionQA regions demonstrate improved supervision and controllable allocation tradeoffs. Policy training on four Roleplay collections improves preference prediction for both seen and unseen individuals. When prioritizing a designated group and poorly represented individuals, acquiring human labels for 20% of comparisons recovers 75-86% of the average predictive utility gap betw

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis +20 70%3822ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-15 05:41
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

WAPA optimizes human feedback allocation for pluralistic alignment, potentially reducing bias.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     arXiv cs.LG (Machine Learning) (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   cfdbc65b-a89b-4ac8-a90a-94061ff937dc
           https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.19035
   ↓
EVIDENCE   2 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  1 run, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      +20  (Favourable)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 70%