Provenance record

Reinforcement Learning over Patient Trajectories for Clinical Reasoning in EHR Foundation Models

arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1, academic) 2026-09-14T04:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Preprints on societal impact.


Discourse valence
+50
Favourable
confidence 70% · 1 item
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Single-model reading. This item did not meet the threshold for a multi-model panel.
Governance and regulationMedicine and healthScientific acceleration
Excerpt as ingested

arXiv:2609.12277v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electronic health record (EHR) foundation models trained on longitudinal patient trajectories have demonstrated strong performance across diverse clinical prediction tasks. However, their clinical reasoning capabilities remain constrained by next-token prediction on limited and incomplete EHR data. To address this, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) fine-tuning framework that treats EHR foundation models as generative policies over patient trajectories. We formulate common clinical prediction problems (e.g., hospital readmission) as event-conditioned, time-windowed reasoning tasks. We then design time-aware, rollout-sensitive rewards to account for finite rollout lengths and temporally inconclusive outcomes. We find that RL fine-tuning consistently improves over pre-trained backbones and strong baselines. Notably, it enables smaller models to surpass larger pre-trained models in data-limited regimes and induces positive transfer across tasks. Further analysis shows that RL fine-tuned models generate trajectories with stronger structural and semantic alignment to ground truth and greater downstream utility.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis +50 70%3147ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-14 05:41
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

Improved clinical reasoning

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   92f11723-18d7-45dc-bc7c-8fd7cc951622
           https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12277
   ↓
EVIDENCE   2 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  1 run, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      +50  (Favourable)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 70%