Provenance record

L2G-SR: Learning to Guide LLM-based Symbolic Regression

arXiv cs.AI (tier 1, academic) 2026-10-16T04:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Preprints. Not peer reviewed at time of posting.


Discourse valence
+50
Favourable
confidence 80% · 1 item
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Single-model reading. This item did not meet the threshold for a multi-model panel.
Evaluation and measurementGovernance and regulationScaling and architecture
Excerpt as ingested

arXiv:2610.20685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Symbolic regression searches for an equation that explains observed data. Numerical error is commonly used to guide the search, but it alone can favor an accurate surrogate over a candidate with the right structure. We propose L2G-SR, a framework for LLM-based symbolic regression that guides search with a learned structural verifier. We construct structural supervision signal using tree edit distance (TED), accounting for commutative operators and alternative expression forms. A verifier first aligns numerical observations with the formulas, then learns to score a candidate's structural similarity to the target formula. At search time, the target formula is hidden and the verifier complements numerical error in parent selection. An analyst then uses verifier feedback and diagnostic tools to propose revisions, which a generator converts into refined expressions. On LLM-SRBench, L2G-SR achieves state-of-the-art numerical fit, equation level accuracy and TED across the evaluated LLM backbones and domains. L2G-SR demonstrates the value of learned structural guidance for LLM-based symbolic regression.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis +50 80%3178ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-16 05:41
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

L2G-SR improves equation search accuracy

evidence: primary horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     arXiv cs.AI (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   8f805b80-4c85-44bb-aaf3-d151a192326e
           https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.20685
   ↓
EVIDENCE   1 extracted excerpt
   ↓
MODEL RUN  1 run, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      +50  (Favourable)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 80%