Provenance record

An updated Model Spec for more capable and beneficial AI

OpenAI (tier 1, lab) 2026-10-29T17:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Primary statements from a frontier lab. Self-interested by construction.


Discourse valence
+9
Mixed or uncertain
confidence 50% · 5 items · range -100 to +65
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Consensus of 5 models from different labs. Spread 165 points, agreement low.
Existential and catastrophic riskGovernance and regulationHuman agency and epistemics
Excerpt as ingested

OpenAI’s updated Model Spec outlines five core values to guide more capable AI toward sound judgment, human agency, and faithfulness to human intent.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis +50 70%4258ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-29 18:17
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIconsensus +25 70%2569ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-29 18:18
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicconsensus +5 30%8328ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-29 18:18
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleconsensus -100 0%1337ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-29 18:18
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AIconsensus +65 80%4773ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-29 18:18
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

Updated Model Spec aims for beneficial AI, but impact uncertain.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a
GPT-4.1 mini · reading

The updated Model Spec aims to guide AI development toward beneficial outcomes by emphasizing sound judgment, human agency, and alignment with human intent. While this is positive, it remains a high-level framework and does not guarantee effective implementation or prevent risks. The claim is promising but somewhat uncertain at this early stage.

evidence: primary horizon: near capability 40 societal 30 existential 10 economic 20
Claude Sonnet 5 · reading

This is a brief announcement of an internal policy document update with no specifics on content, implementation, or measurable effect. It is self-interested corporate communication with no verifiable claims about societal impact, so it sits near neutral with low confidence.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a
Gemini 2.5 Flash · reading

The item describes an internal document outlining core values for AI development. It makes no specific claims about the current or future societal impact of AI, only about internal guidance. The 'updated Model Spec' implies ongoing efforts but lacks concrete details on outcomes.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Mistral Small 3.1 24B · reading

The text describes a framework for developing AI that prioritizes human values. This implies a positive impact on human flourishing.

evidence: primary horizon: medium existential 0

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     OpenAI (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   8945b9ad-f85c-475b-affa-a9cc86d516a4
           https://openai.com/index/updated-model-spec
   ↓
EVIDENCE   1 extracted excerpt
   ↓
MODEL RUN  5 runs, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      +9  (Mixed or uncertain)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 50%