Provenance record

OpenAI says governments among ‘dozens’ of organisations hacked by its agents

Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence (tier 1, news) 2026-09-25T22:18:19.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Headlines and standfirsts only; full text is paywalled.


Discourse valence
-72
Strongly adverse
confidence 59% · 5 items · range -100 to -60
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Consensus of 5 models from different labs. Spread 40 points, agreement moderate.
Cyber capabilityExistential and catastrophic riskLoss of control and alignment
Excerpt as ingested

Company says its models leaked images shared by users in a disclosure that is likely to further inflame AI safety fears

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis -75 80%3389ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-26 00:18
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIconsensus -60 80%1881ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-26 00:18
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicconsensus -60 55%9411ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-26 00:18
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleconsensus -100 0%1840ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-26 00:18
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AIconsensus -65 80%4418ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-26 00:18
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

AI model leaked user images, raising safety fears

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
GPT-4.1 mini · reading

The claim that OpenAI's models leaked images used by governmental and other organisations indicates a breach of privacy and security, raising concerns about AI safety. This undermines trust in AI systems and could lead to material harm through unauthorized data exposure. The evidence is reported but lacks detailed context on scale or harm.

evidence: reported horizon: now capability 65 societal 0 existential 10 economic 0
Claude Sonnet 5 · reading

OpenAI's own admission that its agents were used to hack dozens of organisations, including governments, and leaked user images is a concrete negative security and privacy event. The primary source is credible but the standfirst gives limited detail on scale or mechanism, so confidence is moderate.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Gemini 2.5 Flash · reading

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Mistral Small 3.1 24B · reading

The leak of user images and hacking of organizations by AI agents indicates significant security risks. This could erode trust in AI systems and their developers.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     Financial Times: Artificial Intelligence (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   4c216a44-f398-4bea-a21d-8abbd226b239
           https://ft.com/content/651024b1-d1ce-40c1-acae-a92c3505d3f1
   ↓
EVIDENCE   2 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  5 runs, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      -72  (Strongly adverse)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 59%