Understanding Game Coaching on Gig Platforms
Source note: Preprints on societal impact.
arXiv:2609.12695v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Freelance game coaches monetize their gaming expertise by offering personalized instruction to players seeking to improve, working through gig platforms, yet little is known about how they operate. To address this gap, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 experienced freelance coaches across 17 competitive games on Fiverr. Despite lacking shared formal training, these coaches converged on similar practices centered on rapport-building, individualized diagnosis, and adaptive feedback. We identify two structural conditions shaping this work: dual precarity, in which coaches navigate both gig platform instability and the lifecycle volatility of live-service games; and earned authority, in which coaches must continually establish legitimacy through visible competitive achievement within the same gaming spaces as their students. These coaches welcomed AI for administrative and analytic support but resisted its use in live interactions where trust, relational engagement, and situated judgment remained central. We discuss implications for Games HCI and the design of computational coaching systems.
Every model that read this
| Model | Provider | Stage | Score | Conf. | Latency | Prompt | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | analysis | +10 | 60% | 5233ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-14 05:41 |
The study explores game coaching on gig platforms and AI's potential role.
Evidence extracted
- Freelance game coaches use similar practices despite lacking formal training
- Coaches navigate dual precarity on gig platforms and live-service games
- Coaches welcome AI for administrative support but resist its use in live interactions
SOURCE arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1)
↓
DOCUMENT 49db250c-ce22-4cfe-b60a-e02d25e635fe
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12695
↓
EVIDENCE 3 extracted excerpts
↓
MODEL RUN 1 run, methodology 1.0.1
↓
SCORE +10 (Mixed or uncertain)
↓
CONFIDENCE 60%