Researchers used Claude to hack OpenAI
Cyber researchers broke into OpenAI using its key rival Anthropic’s software, highlighting vulnerabilities in the ChatGPT maker’s security as leading AI companies face mounting scrutiny over safety. A small cyber security group gained access to an OpenAI employee’s ChatGPT account, which permitted them to read private software information and suggest changes. The researchers had been given access to an Anthropic tool specifically designed for security professionals, and were paid for the work as part of a program to find vulnerabilities before they could be exploited by bad actors. Read full article Comments
Every model that read this
| Model | Provider | Stage | Score | Conf. | Latency | Prompt | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | analysis | -75 | 80% | 3299ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-18 18:18 |
| GPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | consensus | -40 | 85% | 2951ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-18 18:18 |
| Claude Sonnet 5 | Anthropic | consensus | -12 | 50% | 9444ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-18 18:18 |
| Gemini 2.5 Flash | consensus | -100 | 90% | 1744ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-18 18:19 | |
| Mistral Small 3.1 24B | Mistral AI | consensus | +65 | 90% | 9794ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-09-18 18:19 |
Vulnerabilities in AI security
The successful use of an AI tool from a competitor to breach OpenAI's security reveals risks of AI-enabled cyber attacks compromising sensitive information, which could undermine trust and encourage malicious exploitation. However, since this occurred in a controlled security research context, the immediate societal harm is limited but concerning.
This describes an authorized, paid vulnerability-finding exercise rather than a malicious hack, so the immediate implication is mixed. It reveals real security weaknesses at a major AI lab but also shows responsible disclosure practices in place, keeping the net implication mildly negative rather than severe.
Researchers successfully used a rival AI to gain unauthorized access to an OpenAI employee's account, allowing them to read private software information. This incident demonstrates a tangible security vulnerability in a leading AI company, posing a significant risk if exploited maliciously. The event directly implicates AI's potential for misuse in cybersecurity.
The item describes a successful security test that identified vulnerabilities in OpenAI's systems. This proactive approach to security is positive for human flourishing. The collaboration between rival companies for security purposes is also encouraging.
Evidence extracted
- Researchers broke into OpenAI using Anthropic's software
- Researchers gained access to an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account
SOURCE Ars Technica: AI (tier 1)
↓
DOCUMENT 236bc0c5-68a9-4868-b392-64be1c8d3cbd
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/researchers-used-claude-to-hack-openai
↓
EVIDENCE 2 extracted excerpts
↓
MODEL RUN 5 runs, methodology 1.0.1
↓
SCORE -32 (Adverse)
↓
CONFIDENCE 79%