Provenance record

A Reusable Semantic Web Framework for Evidence-Grounded Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments under the EU AI Act

arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1, academic) 2026-10-01T04:00:00.000Z Original ↗

Source note: Preprints on societal impact.


Discourse valence
0
Mixed or uncertain
confidence 70% · 1 item
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Single-model reading. This item did not meet the threshold for a multi-model panel.
Employment and displacementEvaluation and measurementGovernance and regulation
Excerpt as ingested

arXiv:2609.39537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The EU AI Act (Art. 27) requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIAs) before deployment, yet the evidence needed for credible assessments is fragmented across incompatible incident repositories, risk vocabularies, and legal texts. We present a reusable Semantic Web-based framework that consolidates this evidence for two high-risk public sector categories: employment and worker management (Annex III(4)) and access to essential public services (Annex III(5)(a)). A curated 150-record corpus is annotated along four axes using keyword, LLM, and hybrid methods and serialised as a SPARQL-queryable knowledge graph of 1,351 RDF triples. Five FRIA demonstration scenarios surface 103 records (68.7% coverage). Evaluation against a 69-record gold standard reveals that LLM-assisted classification of the employment domain achieves only $\kappa = 0.045$, a cautionary result for automated fairness-related evidence retrieval in this domain. All artefacts are released openly to support adoption by regulators, national authorities, and SMEs.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis 0 70%5416ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-10-01 06:18
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

The item presents a framework for assessing AI impact on fundamental rights, but its effectiveness is uncertain due to low accuracy in LLM-assisted classification.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   1e1c0dc3-ab6a-4997-ba2e-9127ad38d01d
           https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39537
   ↓
EVIDENCE   3 extracted excerpts
   ↓
MODEL RUN  1 run, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      0  (Mixed or uncertain)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 70%