A Reusable Semantic Web Framework for Evidence-Grounded Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments under the EU AI Act
Source note: Preprints on societal impact.
arXiv:2609.39537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The EU AI Act (Art. 27) requires deployers of high-risk AI systems to conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIAs) before deployment, yet the evidence needed for credible assessments is fragmented across incompatible incident repositories, risk vocabularies, and legal texts. We present a reusable Semantic Web-based framework that consolidates this evidence for two high-risk public sector categories: employment and worker management (Annex III(4)) and access to essential public services (Annex III(5)(a)). A curated 150-record corpus is annotated along four axes using keyword, LLM, and hybrid methods and serialised as a SPARQL-queryable knowledge graph of 1,351 RDF triples. Five FRIA demonstration scenarios surface 103 records (68.7% coverage). Evaluation against a 69-record gold standard reveals that LLM-assisted classification of the employment domain achieves only $\kappa = 0.045$, a cautionary result for automated fairness-related evidence retrieval in this domain. All artefacts are released openly to support adoption by regulators, national authorities, and SMEs.
Every model that read this
| Model | Provider | Stage | Score | Conf. | Latency | Prompt | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 3.3 70B | Meta | analysis | 0 | 70% | 5416ms | v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 | 2026-10-01 06:18 |
The item presents a framework for assessing AI impact on fundamental rights, but its effectiveness is uncertain due to low accuracy in LLM-assisted classification.
Evidence extracted
- A reusable Semantic Web framework is presented for evidence-grounded Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments under the EU AI Act
- The framework consolidates evidence for high-risk AI systems in employment and public services
- LLM-assisted classification achieves low accuracy in the employment domain
SOURCE arXiv cs.CY (Computers and Society) (tier 1)
↓
DOCUMENT 1e1c0dc3-ab6a-4997-ba2e-9127ad38d01d
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.39537
↓
EVIDENCE 3 extracted excerpts
↓
MODEL RUN 1 run, methodology 1.0.1
↓
SCORE 0 (Mixed or uncertain)
↓
CONFIDENCE 70%