Provenance record

Inside the Discussions at AI Companies Over a Superintelligence Doomsday

The New York Times: Technology (tier 1, news) 2026-09-12T09:03:01.000Z Original ↗

Discourse valence
-49
Adverse
confidence 47% · 5 items · range -100 to -15
Adverse readingFavourable reading
Consensus of 5 models from different labs. Spread 85 points, agreement low.
AGI and timelinesExistential and catastrophic riskLoss of control and alignment
Excerpt as ingested

Researchers at Anthropic, OpenAI, Meta and Google are increasingly trying to raise awareness about the risks of artificial intelligence.

Every model that read this

ModelProviderStageScoreConf.LatencyPromptWhen
Llama 3.3 70BMetaanalysis -50 60%3047ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-12 09:17
GPT-4.1 miniOpenAIconsensus -40 70%3638ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-12 09:17
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropicconsensus -15 25%4267ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-12 09:17
Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogleconsensus -100 0%2089ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-12 09:17
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AIconsensus -40 80%8172ms v1.0.0 / m1.0.1 2026-09-12 09:17
Llama 3.3 70B · reading

Raises awareness of AI risks

evidence: anecdotal horizon: n/a
GPT-4.1 mini · reading

The article indicates that major AI companies are raising awareness about AI risks, implying serious concerns about potential negative impacts of AI development. This suggests a materially concerning implication, but lacks specific evidence of outcomes or incidents for a stronger score.

evidence: reported horizon: near capability 70 societal 0 existential 0 economic 0
Claude Sonnet 5 · reading

The text only states that researchers are 'increasingly trying to raise awareness' without any concrete findings, data, or specific claims about capabilities or harms. This is a framing teaser, not substantive evidence of risk or its magnitude.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Gemini 2.5 Flash · reading

The article reports that researchers at major AI companies are increasingly trying to raise awareness about AI risks. While the specific nature of these risks is not detailed, the title's reference to 'superintelligence doomsday' suggests a concern about extreme negative outcomes, though this specific phrase may be hyperbolic. The piece indicates internal discussions rather than external events, making the implication somewhat speculative about actual societal impact.

evidence: reported horizon: n/a
Mistral Small 3.1 24B · reading

The article discusses efforts to raise awareness about AI risks. This implies a concern about potential negative impacts. The magnitude of the concern is not specified, so the score is moderate.

evidence: speculative horizon: n/a

Evidence extracted

The chain
SOURCE     The New York Times: Technology (tier 1)
   ↓
DOCUMENT   02454ae3-9cd5-4786-92dc-0295aa61c26e
           https://nytimes.com/2026/09/12/technology/doomsday-discussions-ai-companies.html
   ↓
EVIDENCE   1 extracted excerpt
   ↓
MODEL RUN  5 runs, methodology 1.0.1
   ↓
SCORE      -49  (Adverse)
   ↓
CONFIDENCE 47%